Reimagining Language: The IDEA Committee's Perspective on Correctional Terminology

As members of the IDEA Committee—Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility—we recently undertook the task of reviewing terminology within Assistance Dogs International’s Standards, specifically concerning individuals in correctional facilities who work with our member organizations to socialize or train future assistance dogs. This process initiated an important conversation within our committee, compelling us to reflect on the complexities of the criminal justice system and the power of language in shaping perceptions.

We believe it is crucial to recognize that people within the justice system should not be solely defined by their circumstances. For this reason, we proposed modifying the term "inmate handlers" to simply "handlers." This adjustment, though small, holds significance for us. It symbolizes Assistance Dogs International’s and its member organizations’ commitment, particularly within correctional institutions, to promoting growth and development in individuals, rather than reinforcing stigmatized identities.

Traditionally, society has perceived incarceration as a state where individuals experience perpetual punishment, with the deprivation of freedom assumed to permeate every aspect of their existence. However, many within the correctional field argue that the loss of liberty itself is the fundamental penalty. Institutions operate to shield the public while enabling individuals to reflect, repair, and rehabilitate. From the first day of incarceration, individuals should ideally be supported on a journey toward understanding their actions, providing solace to those affected, and preparing for reintegration.

The term "inmate" has a deep-rooted and complex history, with origins as far back as 1756 in Samuel Johnson's works and appearing in the Webster's American Dictionary in the 1800s. While it once broadly referred to those cohabiting a space, today it is largely synonymous with "prisoner," carrying a narrow and often negative connotation. The IDEA Committee may not influence the structure of the global criminal justice system, but we can advocate for language that honors person-centered approaches, recognizing individuals' beliefs, needs, and relationships within their communities and society at large.

To us, the opportunity for individuals in correctional facilities to participate in our organizations’ programs demonstrates a readiness to engage constructively with society. Referring to them as "handlers" rather than "inmates" acknowledges this potential, and shifts focus from their past identities to their current and future contributions. By participating in our members’ programs, these individuals make a conscious effort toward reintegration, a commitment we believe should be reflected in the language we use.

Our decision to replace "inmate" with "handler" highlights our commitment to affirming the dignity and potential of individuals within correctional facilities, aligning their roles with those of their counterparts outside such institutions. Whether performing similar duties as volunteers or paid professionals, the contributions of all handlers deserve respect. We aim to see them for who they are now and the positive impact they are striving to make.

In conclusion, the language we choose shapes our perceptions and attitudes. By reframing our terminology, we underscore the humanity and potential of those within the correctional system, offering a perspective that focuses on rehabilitation, dignity, and the promise of a hopeful future. Together, we are working towards a more inclusive and respectful understanding of individuals and their journeys toward reintegration.

###

 Duncan has worked in the assistance dog world for over 25 years, beginning his career at Dogs for Good as an instructor training assistance dogs for physically disabled adults. As the charity grew its services to support both children and adults with complex needs, Duncan was active in the development of services that are centered around both the needs of each individual and family and the wellbeing of dogs. He is passionate about the human-dog bond and the charity’s belief that by developing mutually beneficial partnerships the impact can be truly life-changing. His education and professional training relate to coaching and leadership, project and quality management and disability. Duncan has attended many of the ADI conferences and has presented as a keynote speaker, talking about the human-dog bond. Duncan supports ADI by co-chairing the organizations Diversity, Equality and Inclusion committee, a group committed to developing support and resources for member organizations. Away from work Duncan is an English Football Association qualified coach and a strong advocate for girls and women’s football, running  weekly coaching sessions for two teams.

Brittani Uribe Sleets is the Senior Director of Inclusion and Diversity at Canine Companions, leading initiatives to celebrate diverse identities, and promote an inclusive culture. 

Interested in writing a blog post for ADI? Please see our submission form.